The voluntary nature of Arbitration process



Charter Party Arbitration is a voluntary process which arises out of an agreement of the parties named in the Charter Party. All Charter Parties contain a specific clause providing for arbitration. The Federal Arbitration Act which governs all matters connected with the maritime arbitration process, as well as state law require that the right to arbitrate must be expressed in writing. Arbitration therefore can be described as a voluntary process that is quasi-judicial in nature and it is designed to adjudicate and determine all disputes arising under a relevant charter party.

Because arbitration arises out of consent, it binds only those parties privy to the contract. Therefore, when there is a dispute, the arbitration process relates solely to the owners and charterers under the charter party in question. In addition to the above general rule, there are others who are permitted to arbitrate e.i. subsidiaries of the named parties to the charter party such as the shipping subsidiary arm of an oil company,foreign subsidiaries or parent companies of the named charterers who might have disputes arising out of the charter party and so on.

Although these parties technically are not members of the charter party, a number of arbitration panels have held that wholly owned subsidiaries and/or companies under the same financial control have a right to arbitrate just as they themselves were parties to the charter party.

An exception to the limitation of arbitration to the named parties is court-ordered, consolidated arbitration proceedings. Federal courts have ruled that back-to-back charter parties, may be consolidated into a single proceeding if it is evident to the court that similar issues of fact and law are involved.

The consolidated arbitration procedure obviously transgresses the basic concept that only those parties privy to an agreement may be forced to arbitrate as per their agreement. However the courts have found this to be an effective procedure in disposing issues that have a common thread running through consecutive charter parties. If parties have agreed to arbitrate their differences, they are bound to do so. However there are means by which parties may sidestep their prior agreement and proceed to litigate their disputes.

Obviously a waiver of a party's right to arbitrate produces that effect. Another method is for one of the parties to commence litigation and the other to respond. This has been held by the courts to constitute a waiver of the right to arbitrate.


This way back to the menu, please!
For more info please contact George N.Rigos George@Rigos.com